Re: [PWE3] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vainshtein-cesopsn-06.txt

[Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>]

On 6/17/03 12:29 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> I am in favor this draft becoming a WG item. This standard is needed, and this
> approach seems to be the one that comes closer to catching significant
> support. The number of participants in the process supporting the standard
> seems to exceed by far the threshold that would ensure interoperable
> implementations and further advancement of the standard.

Really?  Can you elaborate on this (i.e., how many other folks have/are
implementing this)?

Thanks!

-danny


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3