RE: [PWE3] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vainshtein-cesopsn-06.txt

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

Danny,

I am seeing the messages that you are seeing - maybe less :-)

Assuming that people who declared their support are doing it on a responsible manner, it looks that there are more than two independent implementations on the way.  

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny McPherson [mailto:danny@tcb.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 4:53 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vainshtein-cesopsn-06.txt
> 
> 
> On 6/17/03 12:29 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" 
> <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
> 
> > I am in favor this draft becoming a WG item. This standard 
> is needed, and this
> > approach seems to be the one that comes closer to catching 
> significant
> > support. The number of participants in the process 
> supporting the standard
> > seems to exceed by far the threshold that would ensure interoperable
> > implementations and further advancement of the standard.
> 
> Really?  Can you elaborate on this (i.e., how many other 
> folks have/are
> implementing this)?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -danny
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3