[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PWE3] RE: CEM vs CEP in draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-allocation-01.txt



Sasha,

OK, sounds good.

Cheers,
Andy

------

At 6/17/2003 06:07 PM +0200, Sasha Vainshtein wrote:
Andy,
Understood.
IMO, worth an explanation in the draft (since you
are fixing the broken reference).

With best regards,
                                   Sasha Vainshtein
email:     sasha@axerra.com <mailto:sasha@axerra.com>
tel:       +972-3-7659993 (office)
           +972-8-9254948 (res.)
           +972-58-674833 (cell.)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:Andy.Malis@vivacenetworks.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:06 PM
> To: Sasha Vainshtein
> Cc: 'Andrew G. Malis'; Mark Townsley (E-mail); Luca (E-mail);
> pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: CEM vs CEP in draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-allocation-01.txt
>
>
> Sasha,
>
> Except that shipping implementations are using the current
> value - I would
> like to grandfather it in.  That's certainly been done in the
> past and it's
> not a tight resource.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
> ---------
>
> At 6/17/2003 05:48 PM +0200, Sasha Vainshtein wrote:
> >Andy,
> >Thank you for a clarification. The situation is well understood.
> >However, since CEM is NOT going to be a standard, I would
> >suggest assigning it a value in the vendror-specific range.
> >
> >With best regards,
> >                                    Sasha Vainshtein
> >email:     sasha@axerra.com <mailto:sasha@axerra.com>
> >tel:       +972-3-7659993 (office)
> >            +972-8-9254948 (res.)
> >            +972-58-674833 (cell.)
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:Andy.Malis@vivacenetworks.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 4:41 PM
> > > To: Sasha Vainshtein
> > > Cc: Mark Townsley (E-mail); Luca (E-mail); pwe3@ietf.org;
> > > Andrew G. Malis (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: CEM vs CEP in draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-allocation-01.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > Sasha,
> > >
> > > CEP is, as we know, going to be the standards track
> > > specification.  However, it is still a bit of a moving
> > > target, and I can't
> > > speak for other companies, but Vivace intends to hold off on
> > > completing our
> > > implementation until we're in the final stages of publishing
> > > the RFC, since
> > > it's being implemented in silicon.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, there are several existing implementations of CEM,
> > > including
> > > Vivace's.  Once CEP is ready to replace CEM in the field, we
> > > need a new PW
> > > type for it since the bits on the wire will be different -
> > > otherwise it
> > > will be impossible to gracefully upgrade.  It's not like
> > > we're running out
> > > of PW types.
> > >
> > > Finally, once CEP has been published as the standards track
> > > document, we
> > > intend to publish CEM as an informational/historical RFC to
> > > document the
> > > original implementations for posterity.
> > >
> > > Thanks for pointing out the broken reference.  I'll fix it.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > -------
> > >
> > > At 6/17/2003 04:42 PM +0200, Sasha Vainshtein wrote:
> > > >Mark and Luca,
> > > >Can you (or Andy) explain why it is necessary to maintain
> > > >separate PW types for CEP and CEM?
> > > >And, BTW, CEM description includes a reference [8] which is
> > > >simply lacking in the document. If a reference to draft-malis has
> > > >been intended, this draft seem to be expired (no such at the
> > > IETF site)...
> > > >
> > > >With best regards,
> > > >                                    Sasha Vainshtein
> > > >email:     sasha@axerra.com <mailto:sasha@axerra.com>
> > > >tel:       +972-3-7659993 (office)
> > > >            +972-8-9254948 (res.)
> > > >            +972-58-674833 (cell.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> [mailto:Internet-Drafts@ietf.org]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:58 PM
> > > > > Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
> > > > > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-allocation-01.txt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
> > > > > Internet-Drafts directories.
> > > > > This draft is a work item of the Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge
> > > > > to Edge Working Group of the IETF.
> > > > >
> > > > >       Title           : IANA Allocations for pseudo Wire
> > > Edge to Edge
> > > > >                           Emulation (PWE3)
> > > > >       Author(s)       : L. Martini, W. Townsley
> > > > >       Filename        : draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-allocation-01.txt
> > > > >       Pages           : 5
> > > > >       Date            : 2003-6-16
> > > > >
> > > > > The Control and maintenance protocol for providing
> various Layer 1
> > > > > and Layer 2 services over a Packet Switched Network has been
> > > > > described in [2]. This document pre-allocates the fixed
> > > Pseudo-wire
> > > > > identifier , and other fixed protocol values that are to
> > > be assigned
> > > > > by IANA using the 'IETF Consensus' policy defined in RFC2434
> > > > >
> > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-alloc
> > > > > ation-01.txt
> > > > >
> > > > > To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send
> > > a message to
> > > > > ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body
> > > > > of the message.
> > > > >
> > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login
> > > > > with the username
> > > > > "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After
> > > logging in,
> > > > > type "cd internet-drafts" and then
> > > > >       "get draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-allocation-01.txt".
> > > > >
> > > > > A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
> > > > > http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> > > > > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
> > > > >
> > > > > Send a message to:
> > > > >       mailserv@ietf.org.
> > > > > In the body type:
> > > > >       "FILE
> > > /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-iana-allocation-01.txt".
> > > > >
> > > > > NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
> > > > >       MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.
>  To use this
> > > > >       feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before
> > > the "FILE"
> > > > >       command.  To decode the response(s), you will need
> > > "munpack" or
> > > > >       a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant
> > > > > mail readers
> > > > >       exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
> > > > >       "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which
> > > have been split
> > > > >       up into multiple messages), so check your local
> > > documentation on
> > > > >       how to manipulate these messages.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant
> mail reader
> > > > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII
> version of the
> > > > > Internet-Draft.
> > > > >
> > >
>
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3