[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PWE3] VCCV ?

To: "George Swallow" <swallow at cisco.com>, "Luca Martini" <lmartini at cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [PWE3] VCCV ?
From: "Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s at rad.com>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 14:00:09 +0300
Cc: <tnadeau at cisco.com>, "Monique \"Morrow \"\(mmorrow\)" <mmorrow at cisco.com>, "PWE3 \(IETF\)" <pwe3 at ietf.org>
List-help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>,<mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>,<mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: pwe3-admin at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcQ56xbj5bmqQDoIT9ig33C3OX4SKwBSXWSw
Thread-topic: [PWE3] VCCV ?

 
> If we have to change the name for the VC part then we should 
> change the CV as well.  What is being defined is a channel 
> (and means of signalling) for general operations and management tools.

> It's not limited to Connectivity Verification.

I think that connectivity verification is its main function.

> ps.  It really a channel to ensure the psuedowires are 
> working properly.  Would you believe PWWP? ;-)

What about PW-ping? 
Since ICMP packets are only one option,
more generally could we say PW-probe ?

Y(J)S


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

Prev by Date: Re: [PWE3] VCCV ?
Next by Date: [PWE3] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pwe3-satop-mib-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [PWE3] VCCV ?
Next by thread: [PWE3] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pwe3-satop-mib-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread