IETF Logo Mail Archive

[radext] A way forward with the DTLS document - a poll for WG consensus

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 18 June 2013 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2467421F9DBF for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.83
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.83 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vUumweTEorq7 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1567321F9DCD for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id eb20so3290131lab.29 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:x-priority:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=klvjdKYGSIUniWa4VUIoo347EZF0uf034vQK1uOZmvs=; b=gsmpF5fXvW83F6//lltsPmNhjPbMBLbPT2vLj6FIaQayH/V1lrmKYVfs/YamY3MrkH SxLntzHj7GwoNQuyxL3Qy5TDyjkzVAQLhrIMylE40cbKV0COuQDst1UYE8wgoZqvpBz8 1yJXWIWtrXkmpY5FpbA4cpf5siJ43l1UZT0n8uZxT8R+7P9UDjB49myZg1zmPA5KaxBg 4NED9SJkZMZTTtVbFuyXIJjni/eXxbyoZz7NEHXMEFOts0Pe/s7QebDQl6ImWFxwAlmC ljToTPxJ6d8Yx44qX7r5reHWBik89/9rV6vBzqnE9taoHHxI0n/FzLRYMORs2Teyl4c0 FABg==
X-Received: by 10.112.181.71 with SMTP id du7mr685695lbc.24.1371547506390; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.250.166] ([194.100.71.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id et10sm6843319lbc.6.2013.06.18.02.25.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 1
In-Reply-To: <A95B4818FD85874D8F16607F1AC7C628BC542F@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:25:04 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <7A3DC30B-CBEF-4B4B-B542-89CAB29682BC@gmail.com>
References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <C47910C2-BCEA-4DC2-A016-C98D67B62DD9@gmail.com> <A95B4818FD85874D8F16607F1AC7C628B4032E@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> <517FBD04.1050009@deployingradius.com> <B43B810F-DBF3-4CCD-BFA0-494E10819D2A@gmail.com> <51828E77.9020303@deployingradius.com> <061B9149-3354-4E53-8721-FCD86BF03EF0@gmail.com> <A95B4818FD85874D8F16607F1AC7C628BC542F@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
To: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Subject: [radext] A way forward with the DTLS document - a poll for WG consensus
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:25:26 -0000

Folks,

We still have a sticking issue with the DTLS document on protocol
multiplexing raised by Joe, see:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/current/msg08459.html

So, in order to progress things and get the (rough) WG consensus
what to include in the document, We ask the WG to pick up their
favourite approach from the two choices below. This poll ends on
Tuesday 25th June EOB (EEST).

1) Forbid the protocol multiplexing i.e.,
   require RADIUS over port 1812.

2) Allow protocol multiplexing i.e.,
   Allow RADIUS or DTLS over port 1812.

In both cases, DTLS would be allowed on the DTLS-only TBD port.
The DTLS document will then be changed accordingly to reflect
the WG consensus.


- Jouni & Mauricio

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email