Re: [RAI] Places for small standards-track specifications

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rai-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:rai-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Spencer Dawkins
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:30 PM
> To: rai at ietf.org
> Subject: [RAI] Places for small standards-track specifications
> 
> As I said at the mike in SIP - I like the DISPATCH idea as stated because
> it
> meets a need for a RAI Open Area meeting, but I'd also like to see some
> way
> of producing a small standards-track specification without having to spin
> up
> a working group - that's a lot of overhead that may not be required.
> 
> Any thoughts about where that work might find a home? I'm thinking
> DISPATCH
> handing off to a RAI-WG - a RAI Area Working Group...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RAI mailing list
> RAI at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai