[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RAI] I-D's of former Sipping/Sip WG's
Hadriel,
It's a good question. (I'm in the same situation with http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-york-sipping-p-charge-info
)
Or do we just continue to use "sipping" even though that WG is no
longer there?
Dan
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Howdy,
I have a question with the mechanics of the closing of the SIPPING/
SIP WG's and mailing lists, with regards to Individual Drafts (I-
D's). Some of us have I-D's we submitted to the previous WG's
before the transition, which we'd like to update. For example a
fictitious I-D like draft-smith-spipping-good-idea-05. If Mr. Smith
updates them to the appropriate new WG's using the new WG names and
new number space (.e.g, draft-smith-dispatch-good-idea-00), won't he
lose the automatic links in the tools HTML view of the previous
drafts?
That linking was a rather nice feature, both because it allowed one
to create a fixed HTTP URL which one could give others which would
auto-update to the latest rev, and because it allowed one to view
diffs and such easily. So now Mr. Smith would have to change the
URL he'd been giving folks for some time, and it would lose the
history.
Is there a way to avoid this? (and no, I'm not asking to port all I-
D's from the closed groups)
If this is a major pain in the #$%*&, like it requires tools
changes, then forget it. Just more wondering if something already
exists which lets me^H^H Mr.Smith submit a revved draft without the
break.
-hadriel
_______________________________________________
RAI mailing list
RAI at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai
--
Dan York, Director of Conversations
Voxeo Corporation http://www.voxeo.com dyork at voxeo.com
Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork
Join the Voxeo conversation:
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo http://twitter.com/danyork
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo