Hadriel,
It's a good question. (I'm in the same situation with
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-york-sipping-p-charge-info )
Or do we just continue to use "sipping" even though that WG is no longer
there?
Dan
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Howdy,
I have a question with the mechanics of the closing of the SIPPING/ SIP
WG's and mailing lists, with regards to Individual Drafts (I- D's). Some
of us have I-D's we submitted to the previous WG's before the
transition, which we'd like to update. For example a fictitious I-D
like draft-smith-spipping-good-idea-05. If Mr. Smith updates them to
the appropriate new WG's using the new WG names and new number space
(.e.g, draft-smith-dispatch-good-idea-00), won't he lose the automatic
links in the tools HTML view of the previous drafts?
That linking was a rather nice feature, both because it allowed one to
create a fixed HTTP URL which one could give others which would
auto-update to the latest rev, and because it allowed one to view diffs
and such easily. So now Mr. Smith would have to change the URL he'd
been giving folks for some time, and it would lose the history.
Is there a way to avoid this? (and no, I'm not asking to port all I- D's
from the closed groups)
If this is a major pain in the #$%*&, like it requires tools changes,
then forget it. Just more wondering if something already exists which
lets me^H^H Mr.Smith submit a revved draft without the break.
-hadriel
_______________________________________________
RAI mailing list
RAI at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai
--
Dan York, Director of Conversations
Voxeo Corporation http://www.voxeo.com dyork at voxeo.com
Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork
Join the Voxeo conversation:
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo http://twitter.com/danyork
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo
_______________________________________________
RAI mailing list
RAI at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai