Re: [RAM] Incremental Deployment of LISP

[Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com>]

> > You are right non Marcelo. I think taking the high-road by doing a  
> > LISP-push model gives you the best of all worlds.
>
> by push model, we are talking about destributing the ID to locator  
> mapping database to all LISP routers?

I would say all high-level routers and not to every LISP ITR (or ETR).

> are you thinking in using a protocol for that distribution, like  
> BGP for instance?

A new protocol more optimized perhaps for flooding that has  
authentication built-in.

> There have been a few proposals on this area before, which were  
> very interesting imho, but i guess some people though they were too  
> complex

We can start simple. This doesn't need to be complex and if we keep  
policy out of it ;-) we can keep it easier. Please note, this  
protocol would be there to distribute EID-RLOC mappings and not the  
reachability status of the RLOCs.

Dino

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram