[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RAM] Comment on draft-farinacci-lisp-00.txt (LISP)
Tony,
> On Mar 31, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Ross Callon wrote:
>
> > (1) You are going to make the data plane MUCH slower; or
> > (2) You are going to very lightly load the data plane; or
> > (3) You are going to implement the control aspects of LISP
> > somewhere other than on the central processor; or
> > (4) You are going to build routers whose central processor is
> > several orders of magnitude faster than on current routers; or
> > (5) You feel that you can implement LISP on a PE router
> > with a load on the control plane which is at least 10,000
> > times smaller than the load on the data plane (so that each
> > time a packet goes to the control plane, on the average there
> > are 10,000 or more packets that will be forwarded via the data
> > plane before the next packet needs to go to the control plane)
> >
> > I am guessing that the answer is either (5), or perhaps (3), or
> > (6) You are going to deploy LISP closer to the edge (and NOT
> > in the PE router).
>
>
> If I can paraphrase you, Ross, doing packet forwarding at 10Mpps
> doesn't scare me.
How many EID-to-RLOC mappings ICMP messages per second an ITR/ETR be
required to originate/receive ?
Yakov.
_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram