Re: [RAM] Incremental Deployment of LISP

[Yakov Rekhter <yakov at juniper.net>]

Dino,

> >>> This would be an good example to illustrate that LISP 1.5 offer
> >>> *no* reduction of the volume of routing information.  To the  
> >>> contrary,
> >>> this example would illustrate how LISP 1.5 would result in  
> >>> increasing
> >>> volume of routing information.
> >>
> >> It reduces the unicast FIB.
> >
> > Any *empirical* evidences to support the above claim would be greatly
> > appreciated.
> 
> The point is that the PI prefixes which are in the core today can be  
> removed because they will be routed on another, smaller topology, to  
> be used to probe for locator replies.

Would that still reduce the unicast FIB on the routers that participate
in the "smaller topology" ?

Yakov.

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram