[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval

To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
From: Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:14:33 -0700
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: ram at iab.org
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=428; t=1176740074; x=1177604074; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20Fwd=3A=20RAM=20post=20from=20dino@cisco.com=2 0requires=20approval |Sender:=20; bh=ezv7Hvd3QwhwYkHjJw60QVibEF91gne8OCnbzwUuLaU=; b=CNpGnKv4ysiFdywD+0+puwxgqdyt2N4+leeSaAe8kICqjBT0yOCHVB9GCkwKqqMX+Jj48AgD TNtP5RKdqUQh5RJl5cFXLQiCRDUtIHyt4bEF6k/JzOUOnHfEwGzKJbXueSzsZvmOs7NB+EYqgd J7k9Ii3lPCT+RYUnpgj+zncdk=;
In-reply-to: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029ED6FA@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8F8E726B-D5F2-45B2-AF7F-10D901E74C05@cs.ucla.edu><639879EC-1488-4DFF-AA4D-1FCD46F6BE3D@cisco.com><51FC9304-A2B7-4CB0-A449-8C23F2E6A6DF@lugs.com><348449A1-6A85-446E-A238-B78AD26F703C@cisco.com><A6D2F9D1-D589-444F-8F0F-C34F68AC163A@lugs.com><Pine.GSO.4.58.0704132128460.12021@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net> <332DD4CB-6026-48AC-8176-4D9DD29A6C3D@cisco.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029ED6FA@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>

I may be missing the point of this, but in a LISP 2/3 world
why couldn't it be that all customers (large and small) could
get PI prefixes if they wanted them? The PI identifiers are
not carried in the core, so there is no strong requirement
for hierarchical aggregation, right?

To make distribution of the mapping entires scale, you don't want to send them everywhere, bandwidth-vs-memory tradeoff.

Dino

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram

References:
- [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
  - From: Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
  - From: Peter Schoenmaker
- Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
  - From: Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
  - From: Peter Schoenmaker
- Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
  - From: Chris L. Morrow
- Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
  - From: Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
  - From: Templin, Fred L

Prev by Date: Re: [RAM] Incremental Deployment of LISP
Next by Date: Re: [RAM] 6to4
Previous by thread: RE: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
Next by thread: Re: [RAM] Fwd: RAM post from dino@cisco.com requires approval
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread