Re: [RAM] Comment on draft-farinacci-lisp-00.txt (LISP)

[marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo at it.uc3m.es>]

Yakov,

El 16/04/2007, a las 22:01, Yakov Rekhter escribió:

> Noel,
>
> > > From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov at juniper.net>
> >
> > > My question was in the context of LISP 1.5.
> >
> > Dino just mentioned how LISP 1 is a "phase 0 prototype effort", and I 
> > suspect
> > the same is true, in some ways, of many of the lower numbered LISP 
> > variants.
> > My sense is that the one that gets deployed in large-scale operational
> > service is likely to be LISP 4 or 5 (or more), i.e. one that's not yet
> > defined.
> >
> > My guess is that the architectural commonality between LISP 1/1.5/etc 
> > and the
> > eventual deployed stuff is likely to be:
> >
> > - Hosts and local routers don't need to be modified
> > - The existing internetwork layer is "jacked up" to become mostly an
> > 	end-end host naming layer
> > - End-end names are mapped into new locators as they cross the 
> > boundary
>
> What you called "end-end names" are not really "end-end names" but
> locators.

but they can be end to end names, since they can be globally unique. 
OTOH, they cannot be globally routable.

So, they can be global identifiers as Noel mentions,  but also as you 
mention they are locators with a narrower scope (the site). this is 
what basically ULAs are

regards, marcelo


>  It just the scope of these locators is not the whole
> Internet. What you do at the boundaries is mapping of site-wide
> locators into the ISP locators.
>
> Yakov.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAM mailing list
> RAM at iab.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram


_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram