[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ID/loc mapping distribution protocol (was Re: [RAM] Incremental Deployment of LISP




On Apr 21, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:

At this time, I think its much more interesting to talk about the
properties of the mapping system and protocol than to make a
decision on reuse vs. new protocol. Push vs. pull, dynamics,
security properties, trust model, scalability requirements,
aggregated vs. flat, etc. that you talked about in the rest of
this thread are the important questions now. Of course, its
useful to think about what the real-world implementation of
the concepts could be, e.g., a new BGP instance, but lets
not get hang up on the protocol selection just yet.

Jari, I understand your point, but what are we waiting for?


I don't think that Jari is suggesting that we wait. I think that he's suggesting that we think first at the conceptual level and work through the problems that we can see there before we dive into the details.

The solution space is pretty large and implementing each and every point in the solution space is probably not the most efficient (or quickest) approach to getting to the solution that we want.

Tony

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram