Re: ID/loc mapping distribution protocol (was Re: [RAM] Incremental Deployment of LISP

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

Tony, Dino,

> I don't think that Jari is suggesting that we wait.  I think that he's
> suggesting that we think first at the conceptual level and work
> through the problems that we can see there before we dive into the
> details.
>
> The solution space is pretty large and implementing each and every
> point in the solution space is probably not the most efficient (or
> quickest) approach to getting to the solution that we want.

Right. And I don't think we should wait, either -- if you have a mapping
system please write it up in a draft & implement & test. We need that
level of concreteness to understand whether our ideas really work
or not. I was merely suggesting that we do not use a lot of energy
on the list to debate whether the protocol is new or reused. There
are other, more worthy topics to be debated...

Jari


_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram