RE: ID/loc mapping distribution protocol (was Re: [RAM] IncrementalDeployment of LISP

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com>]

Don't know if this will be of interest, but I am planning
to put out an update to IPvLX RSN and that should give new
details for at least one mapping scheme proposal.

Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:dino at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 9:49 PM
> To: Jari Arkko
> Cc: Tony Li; ram at iab.org
> Subject: Re: ID/loc mapping distribution protocol (was Re: 
> [RAM] IncrementalDeployment of LISP
> 
> > Right. And I don't think we should wait, either -- if you have a  
> > mapping
> > system please write it up in a draft & implement & test. We 
> need that
> > level of concreteness to understand whether our ideas really work
> > or not. I was merely suggesting that we do not use a lot of energy
> > on the list to debate whether the protocol is new or reused. There
> > are other, more worthy topics to be debated...
> 
> Okay, sure.
> 
> Dino
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RAM mailing list
> RAM at iab.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram
> 

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram