Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

[David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org>]

Hi,

On May 8, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Dave Thaler wrote:
> I disagree with the word "everything".  The two high level choices  
> are:
>
> PULL: work on-demand (which results in deterministic loss and hence
> adversely affects applications) and cache the result for some time

What applications are adversely affected by a delay in transmitting  
the first packet?  How do such applications work in today's "best  
effort" Internet?

Thanks,
-drc




_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram