[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

To: David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
From: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 09:15:22 +0200
Authentication-results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: ram at iab.org
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=397; t=1178694930; x=1179558930; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20The=20mapping=20problem=3A=20rendezvous=20poi nts? |Sender:=20; bh=Xv+WQsK6MDXQ2LR8GA2gxx4psNIOV/RbaBMFUQhgkvM=; b=eX0v+T6nPxH/yJ8NeJyMC+TumgbXgT8G/SPb76JM0crzndQ+fHLWC35Ofp0M9TskbVbZVe+p s2keapJ5vwI+WgJkL4wh84xeHB2dgvXgW1cAG0Htc1dhxE/F//Gwt5u6;
In-reply-to: <86588E66-ACED-4DD2-B286-3DA5B2518B1A@virtualized.org>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8F47F550-6224-4AFF-8359-CBA98D3F2FAB@muada.com> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA470@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <9C228355-9425-4C66-A9A7-47498490E3B1@virtualized.org> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA59D@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <86588E66-ACED-4DD2-B286-3DA5B2518B1A@virtualized.org>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)

David Conrad wrote:

I was wondering if you had concrete examples of existing applications that would fail with an increase in initial packet latency.

Aside from the fact that Marshall provided such a list, depending on where the split happens, if it's not in the host, then no one can guarantee that the loss is in fact the first packet, or that it's just one packet.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
  - From: David Conrad

References:
- [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
  - From: Dave Thaler
- Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
  - From: David Conrad
- RE: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
  - From: Dave Thaler
- Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
  - From: David Conrad

Prev by Date: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Next by Date: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Previous by thread: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Next by thread: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread