[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RAM] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-idloc-map-cons-01.txt]



On 2007-06-07 18:17, HeinerHummel at aol.com wrote:
Maybe I don't understand the whole topic: Are we really after a loc/id-split or are we after a "2 locators"-addressing scheme ?

That's not the topic of a draft supposedly about mapping, but it's a good question. It's why I've asserted that LISP isn't really an id-loc split at all. We need some agreed terminology.

    Brian

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram