Re: [RAM] Re: draft-bagnulo-lisp-threat-01

[marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo at it.uc3m.es>]

El 13/07/2007, a las 8:08, Dino Farinacci escribió:

> > i don't know, there is no ID describing LISP v2,3,4 afaik
>
> There will probably never be a LISP 2 because many people have  
> sounded off about the circular dependency even though DNS gives the  
> best low latency for a request based mapping lookup (that is, it  
> shares the DNS lookup latency with the map lookup).
>
> The LISP authors have never mentioned or defined a variant numbered 4.
>
> And for LISP 3, there is currently 3 examples of LISP 3, that is  
> CONS, NERD, and APT.

from a security analysis perspective, i guess an important question  
would be if in LISP 3, TR also learn through tunneled data packets  
and MAP-Reply packets as described in the draft-farinacci-lisp-01. If  
yes, then we need to see if the threats identified in the threat  
analysis draft also apply (but it is likely to be the case, if no  
additional measures are taken to prevent them)

regards, marcelo


> Dino


_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram