[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RAM] Re: LISP-01 I-D



One small point from several days back: 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:dino at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:27 PM
> To: marcelo bagnulo braun
> Cc: ram at iab.org
> Subject: Re: [RAM] Re: LISP-01 I-D
> 
> > As i understand it, the new version of LISP described in this 01  
> > version of the draft, no longer uses pure IP in IP tunneling, but  
> > adds a LISP header to the packets (which contains the nonce for  
> > security reasons) right?
> 
> That is correct. We are using UDP encapsulation with a LISP header  
> for the following reasons:
> 
> o Get through firewalls

I think the UDP encapsulation will also get through NATs,
as for other UDP encapsulation schemes like Teredo.

Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram