Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared

[Robin Whittle <rw at firstpr.com.au>]

Further to my response to Dino's message about my comparison, I
have updated the page:

  http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/comp/

to reflect some corrections which are easily visible.

Most importantly, I correct my mistake of not recognising that
that LISP-CONS does not contain any Priority or Weight information
in its mapping - which means that the LISP-CONS ITR has a simple
job, with no decisions or involvement in determining reachability.

There is a section:

  http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/comp/#LC-suggestions

where I point out parts of the current LISP-CONS-01 draft which I
think should be altered, because I think they are contradictory or
confusing.


Although I don't compare IPvLX, there is a section there:

  http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/comp/#IPvLX

which links to http://ipvlx.com and to Fred's recent messages
which helped me understand this proposal better.

  - Robin


_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram