[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared

To: Robin Whittle <rw at firstpr.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
From: Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:03:31 -0700
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com>, ram at iab.org
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=432; t=1185055418; x=1185919418; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20LISP=20NERD/CONS, =20eFIT-APT=20&=20Ivip=20com pared |Sender:=20; bh=r0aypbPWc/jjyDOJlWFKrWk5o98WarLfFZ9P8N7yOP0=; b=E00SueG1c8Y46ELBTSkghg5uhUNcbbk9uEouy9C3t+vbFu4m1MuBOTTKcdOIEfThHW6XAXCe WcWT80j0PgNCwGOmGdTbCsuq6NN7+aLrYuVSInC0/VoAJIH9utT6bz2pWXx66rMNp32tVNVZno 1qkKsrELtgkFeXWY12Le3FsX8=;
In-reply-to: <46A1F2C4.9040605@firstpr.com.au>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <469C962B.1090600@firstpr.com.au> <12D6E107-9D58-487A-BC5C-6BAC9495EC96@cisco.com> <46A084FE.9000003@firstpr.com.au> <46A1F2C4.9040605@firstpr.com.au>

Most importantly, I correct my mistake of not recognising that
that LISP-CONS does not contain any Priority or Weight information
in its mapping - which means that the LISP-CONS ITR has a simple
job, with no decisions or involvement in determining reachability.

You are mistaken again. ;-) Section 6.4 of the CONS-01 draft illustrates that a priority and weight are associated with each locator record.

Dino

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
  - From: Robin Whittle

References:
- [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
  - From: Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
  - From: Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
  - From: Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
  - From: Robin Whittle

Prev by Date: Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
Next by Date: Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
Previous by thread: Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
Next by thread: Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread