[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RAM] IPv6 /32 to /48 prefixes and Tree-Bitmap FIB speed



On 2007-07-20 10:21, Per Heldal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 12:20 +1000, Robin Whittle wrote:
Thanks for answering my questions about /48s and for pointing me
to the guidelines which some or many people follow - Gert
Doering's page:

  http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html


In the absence of scalable IDR and route-certificates you'll also find people using more strict filters in an attempt to achieve operational stability. Such filters aim to keep the maximum numbers of prefixes within the capacity of available hardware. Thus, if a registry allocates blocks out of e.g. a /23 only a small fraction of that /23 may initially be accepted, especially if it is used for PI /48s. The current v6 routing-table may be small, but I'm sure attitudes will change as more people realise the potential impact on their infrastructure as it becomes increasingly common to operate dual-stack networks.

Exactly, and a DFZ with ten million /48s seems to be an unlikely end-point, which is why we are here, I thought.

   Brian

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram