RE: [RAM] New LISP draft available ...

[<philip.eardley at bt.com>]

hi
 
 what's the relationship between the variants of lisp? Is it considered that an operator would migrate through the 4 steps lisp 1 -> 1.5 -> 2 -> 3? Could the variants co-exist? Or are they really 4 independent proposals? ('independent' meaning you make a choice of which *one* to deploy)
 
since lisp 1 uses routable EIDs, will it get the benefits hoped for a locator/ID split approach (in terms of the design goals in draft-irtf-rrg-design-goals)?
 
sorry if questions have already been covered 
 
thanks,
phil

________________________________

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> We have a new LISP-02 draft available. The packet formats are consistent with
> CONS-01 as well as the implementation we are testing.
>
> The draft has been submitted to the ID directory, but you can find a draft
> at:
>
>       http://www.dinof.net/~dino/ietf/draft-farinacci-lisp-02.txt
>
> This version is formatted much better.  ;-)
>
> This draft also reflects comments from Ved Kafle and Olivier Bonaventure.



_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram