[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:58 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:
At most the entire network may need 30 billions of user addresses.
I very strongly disagree with this, in an age of RFID-enabled supply-
chains and of spimes. How precisely was this number derived?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at cisco.com> // 408.527.6376 voice
Culture eats strategy for breakfast.
-- Ford Motor Company
_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram
- References:
- [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- From: Olivier Bonaventure
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.