[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
At 02:11 09/08/2007, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:58 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:
At most the entire network may need 30 billions of user addresses.
I very strongly disagree with this, in an age of RFID-enabled
supply- chains and of spimes. How precisely was this number derived?
The disagreement is over the meaning of the word "network". I use it
here are the namespace concerned by what Thomas describes in his
summary (out of what I call UP). I have no objection if you make it
ten times larger. This is only pi x people and business number.
jfc
_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram
- References:
- [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- From: Olivier Bonaventure
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
- Re: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.