[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:54:46PM -0700, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> >But what about inter-ISP links? I'm assuming this isn't a big issue
> >for high capacity private peering, but here in Europe a lot of
> >peering happens over exchanges, which obviously use equipment that
> >can easily handle larger packets, but so many people are on a big
> >fat shared subnet that it's a given at someone will bring down the
> >lowest common denominator to 1500.
>
> All GigE and higher. We are okay.
You might be. We're not.
At the DECIX, currently the 3rd biggest exchange in Europe, about one
third of the members (all sharing a common L2 network!) are still
connected with 100 Mbit/s.
Which means "1500 for all of them".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 122119
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram