RE: [RAM] Different approaches for different protocols

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Li [mailto:tli at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:28 AM
> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Cc: RJ Atkinson; ram at iab.org
> Subject: Re: [RAM] Different approaches for different protocols
> 
> 
> On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> > However, over on the internet area mailinglist Bob Hinden made the  
> > case that new work on IPv4 should stop and we should focus on IPv6  
> > exclusively and only do the necessary maintenance for IPv4.
> 
> 
> I don't think we got rough consensus on that point.

I second that; IMHO, an IPv6 coexistence with IPv4 is
the most likely scenario moving forward.

Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com
 
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RAM mailing list
> RAM at iab.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram
> 

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM at iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram