Raven Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Oct 20 1999
• Chefren's police state (Re: [Raven] Some Considerations), adam
• Re: [Raven] Re: strong crypto, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: [Raven] RE: raven digest, Vol 1 #23 - 14 msgs, Mikus Grinbergs
• Re: [Raven] Another perspective, Mark Atwood
• RE: [Raven] Another perspective, Carter Bullard
• [Raven] CALEA, Matthew Saroff
• Re: [Raven] RE: raven digest, Vol 1 #23 - 14 msgs, P.J. Ponder
• Re: [Raven] The wiretapping question, Sandy Harris
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Rick Braddam
• RE: [Raven] Another perspective, Paul Ferguson
• Re: [Raven] Another perspective, William Allen Simpson
• [Raven] RE: raven digest, Vol 1 #23 - 14 msgs, Carter Bullard
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Aaron Armitage
• FW: [Raven] FW: Special Stanford Panel On Government Computer Surveillance, Chris Savage
• [Raven] Re: strong crypto, anderser
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, William H. Geiger III
• Re: [Raven] Another Perspective, Ed Stone
• [Raven] FW: Special Stanford Panel On Government Computer Surveillance, Chris Savage
• RE: [Raven] Another perspective, Ed Stone
• Re: [Raven] Another Perspective, Richard Payne
• RE: [Raven] Another perspective, Carter Bullard
• [Raven] Directory Service, Turner W. Rentz, III
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Christian Huitema
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, gustav
• Re: [Raven] Another perspective, C. Wegrzyn
• [Raven] The wiretapping question, gustav
• Re: [Raven] Another perspective, Paul Ferguson
• [Raven] Another perspective, Carter Bullard
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Paul Ferguson
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Robert Joseph Honan
• [Raven] RE: Some Considerations, Dave
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Thomas Junker
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, William Allen Simpson
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, P.J. Ponder
• [Raven] FCC on the record, Meeks, Brock
• [Raven] re: The IETF's position on technology to support legal intercept of data, Computer User
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, chefren
• [Raven] Open the flood gate, Dustin Goodwin
• Oct 19 1999
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, chefren
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Mark Atwood
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Richard Payne
• Re: [raven] Some Considerations, John_David_Galt
• [Raven] Anarchy, key escrow and the masses - mix well, add salt, Turner W. Rentz, III
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Dennis Glatting
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, William H. Geiger III
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, chefren
• [Raven] [fwd] CNN article on IETF & CALEA discussion, Paul Ferguson
• [Raven] New proposed Net protocol, Robert Wood, Chrmn.
• RE: [Raven] Fwd: TIPHON New Working Group 8 "TIPHON Security", Melinda . Shore
• [Raven] Fwd: TIPHON New Working Group 8 "TIPHON Security", Chip Sharp
• re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Richard Payne
• Re: [Raven] The original questions, Paul Ferguson
• Re: working within minimal compliance (Re: [Raven] Some Considerations), adam
• Oct 18 1999
• Re: [Raven] The original questions, chefren
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, chefren
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, chefren
• RE: [Raven] Avoiding unintentional wiretapping, Carter Bullard
• [Raven] Question for clarification, Grenville Armitage
• Re: [Raven] Avoiding unintentional wiretapping, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: [Raven] The original questions, Michael Richardson
• [Raven] Wiretapping, C. Wegrzyn
• Re: [Raven] RE: raven digest, Vol 1 #18 - 16 msgs, Derek Balling
• [Raven] Avoiding unintentional wiretapping, Carter Bullard
• [Raven] RE: raven digest, Vol 1 #18 - 16 msgs, Carter Bullard
• [Raven] The Crypto Defense - Good But Not Good Enough, Richard Payne
• [Raven] IP6 Intercept Proposals, Robin Wilton
• Oct 16 1999
• [Raven] What you willing to sell your self out, Snagnbytz
• Oct 16 1999
• [Raven] Privacy is an antisocial act, Declan McCullagh
• [Raven] Wired article on raven list, Declan McCullagh
• Re: [Raven] The original questions, Vernon Schryver
• [Raven] International P.O.V. by a National, Default
• Re: [Raven] The original questions, John Young
• Re: [Raven] The original questions, Declan McCullagh
• [Raven] The original questions, Sandy Harris
• Oct 15 1999
• RE: [Raven] RE: costs have political influence -- so keep them hi gh (Re: [Rav, Chris Savage
• Re: [Raven] RE: costs have political influence -- so keep them hi, hardie
• RE: [Raven] My personal take on how CALEA Impacts IP technology, William H. Geiger III
• RE: [Raven] RE: costs have political influence -- so keep them hi gh (Re: [Rav, Brian Rosen
• RE: [Raven] RE: costs have political influence -- so keep them high (Re: [Rav, Melinda . Shore
• Re: [Raven] RE: costs have political influence -- so keep them high (Re: [Rav, hardie
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Vernon Schryver
• RE: [Raven] My personal take on how CALEA Impacts IP technology, Carter Bullard
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, William H. Geiger III
• RE: scope interpretations (Re: [Raven] my personal reasons why IE TF should not provide backd) oors for law enforcement, William H. Geiger III
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, chefren
• [Raven] RE: costs have political influence -- so keep them high (Re: [Raven] Why make it easier?), Melinda . Shore
• Re: [Raven] strategy in the GAK skirmish, James Carlson
• No Subject, No Author
• [Raven] EU Scraps Global Net tapping plans, David Sobel
• RE: scope interpretations (Re: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backd) oors for law enforcement, Melinda . Shore
• [Raven] International consistency of requirements, Nicholas Bohm
• RE: [Raven] My personal take on how CALEA Impacts IP technology, Chris Savage
• [Raven] (no subject), mike . grosse-hering/ew/rbg/de
• [Raven] Wiretapping == protocol decoding, Russell Nelson
• Re: working within minimal compliance (Re: [Raven] Some Considerations), Sandy Harris
• [Raven] IPv6 & my privacy, Marcus
• [Raven] My personal take on how CALEA Impacts IP technology, Carter Bullard
• Re: working within minimal compliance (Re: [Raven] Some Considerations), Stuart Staniford-Chen
• Re: [Raven] T1P1 Surveillance Meeting Details (ConferenceCall) (fwd), Chip Sharp
• RE: [Raven] Why make it easier?, Thomas Junker
• scope interpretations (Re: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backd) oors for law enforcement, Adam Back
• raven scope interpretations (Re: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backd) oors for law enforcement, Adam Back
• Re: [Raven] strategy in the GAK skirmish, Paul Ferguson
• Oct 14 1999
• working within minimal compliance (Re: [Raven] Some Considerations), adam
• Re: [Raven] strategy in the GAK skirmish, Matthew Saroff
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, chefren
• [Raven] strategy in the GAK skirmish, Adam Back
• Re: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backdoors for law enforcement, William Allen Simpson
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Declan McCullagh
• law enforcement bias (Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother), adam
• costs have political influence -- so keep them high (Re: [Raven] Why make it easier?), Adam Back
• [Raven] ACLU explanation of what CALEA covers and doesn't, Declan McCullagh
• Re: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backdoors for law enforcement, Ben Laurie
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Vernon Schryver
• RE: [Raven] Fwd: T1P1 Surveillance Meeting Details (Conference Call), Chris Savage
• RE: [Raven] CALEA: CC Docket No. 97-213, Chris Savage
• RE: [Raven] Why make it easier?, Chris Savage
• RE: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backd oors for law enforcement, Richard Willey
• RE: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backd oors for law enforcement, Melinda . Shore
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Eugene Leitl
• [Raven] CALEA nonsense, Russell Nelson
• RE: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backd oors for law enforcement, Brian Rosen
• Re: [Raven] Re: Some Considerations, Christian Huitema
• Re: [Raven] Some Considerations, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• RE: [Raven] Re: Some Considerations, Brian Rosen
• RE: [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backdoors for law enforcement, Melinda . Shore
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Brian Rosen
• [Raven] my personal reasons why IETF should not provide backdoors for law enforcement, Keith Moore
• [Raven] Relevance of CALEA to this whole discussion, Richard Payne
• [Raven] Re: Some Considerations, Richard Payne
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Vernon Schryver
• Re: [Raven] T1P1 Surveillance Meeting Details (ConferenceCall) (fwd), Ben Laurie
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Derek J. Balling
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Brian Rosen
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother - a vote of sorts., Turner W. Rentz, III
• Re: [Raven] T1P1 Surveillance Meeting Details (Conference Call) (fwd), Chip Sharp
• Re: [Raven] A cautionary tale, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Derek J. Balling
• RE: [Raven] Some Considerations, Brian Rosen
• [Raven] A cautionary tale, Eugene Leitl
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Eugene Leitl
• Re: [Raven] A technical question, hardie
• Re: [Raven] T1P1 Surveillance Meeting Details (Conference Call) (fwd), Adam Shostack
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Vernon Schryver
• Re: [Raven] cost - benfit analysis, chefren
• RE: [Raven] CALEA: CC Docket No. 97-213, David Sobel
• Re: [Raven] Fwd: T1P1 Surveillance Meeting Details (Conference Call), Paul Ferguson
• [Raven] John Gilmore: CALEA wiretap law DOES NOT cover the Net, Declan McCullagh
• [Raven] Lycos on IETF wiretap dispute, Declan McCullagh
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, William Allen Simpson
• [Raven] Fwd: T1P1 Surveillance Meeting Details (Conference Call), Chip Sharp
• [Raven] CALEA: CC Docket No. 97-213, Paul Ferguson
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, John A. Limpert
• Re: [Raven] cost - benfit analysis, Paul Ferguson
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Graham Klyne
• Re: [Raven] Why make it easier?, Koen Holtman
• [Raven] Some Considerations, Richard Payne
• [Raven] CALEA: CC Docket No. 97-213, Paul Ferguson
• [Raven] cost - benfit analysis, Richard Willey
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Vernon Schryver
• RE: [Raven] A technical question, Melinda . Shore
• RE: [Raven] A technical question, Vernon Schryver
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Christian Huitema
• Re: [Raven] A technical question, Turner W. Rentz, III
• Re: [Raven] Human rights and strong privacy, Declan McCullagh
• RE: [Raven] A technical question, Brian Rosen
• [Raven] A technical question, Matthew Saroff
• RE: [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?, Melinda . Shore
• RE: [Raven] Why make it easier?, Brian Rosen
• [Raven] Human rights and strong privacy, Declan McCullagh
• RE: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Ron Ryan
• [Raven] Practical Views, Callaghan, Robert
• RE: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Ron Ryan
• RE: [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?, Chris Savage
• [Raven] lawful interception in germany, Johann Wurzenberger
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Paul Ferguson
• RE: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Chris Savage
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Mikus Grinbergs
• RE: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Chris Savage
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Graham Klyne
• Re: [Raven] A cautionary tale, Thomas Junker
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Sandy Harris
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, chefren
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Thomas Junker
• [Raven] Why make it easier?, Paul Crawford
• RE: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, Nicholas Bohm
• [Raven] A cautionary tale, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• Re: [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?, Ben Laurie
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, William Allen Simpson
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Eugene Leitl
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Seth David Schoen
• [Raven] (no subject), Vicente Arias Davila
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Vernon Schryver
• Re: [Raven] Balance, Jim Gillogly
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• [Raven] Balance, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Sandy Harris
• [Raven] Privacy Issues, Rob P. Martin
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Peter Gutmann
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, William H. Geiger III
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Declan McCullagh
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, chefren
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, William H. Geiger III
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Stuart Yeates
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, William H. Geiger III
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Paul Ferguson
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, chefren
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Stuart Yeates
• Oct 13 1999
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• [Raven] [raven]Note about first IDWG meeting, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Paul Ferguson
• no standardization is good (Re: [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?), adam
• Re: [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• [Raven] anonymity, free speech vs big brother, Adam Back
• Re: [Raven] 2 cents, Paul Ferguson
• RE: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Ron Ryan
• RE: [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?, Melinda . Shore
• Re: [Raven] Would it be wise or prudent to invite the FBI to the IETF Meeting?, Richard Lamont
• [Raven] 2 cents, Matt Crawford
• Re: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, hardie
• Re: [Raven] Would it be wise or prudent to invite the FBI to the IETF Meeting?, Declan McCullagh
• RE: [Raven] Determination of the need, Brian Rosen
• [Raven] Would it be wise or prudent to invite the FBI to the IETFMeeting?, Richard Shockey
• RE: [Raven] Determination of the need, Lynn, James
• RE: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Ron Ryan
• RE: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, Brian Rosen
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, Nicholas Bohm
• [Raven] FBI to IETF: It's time for Internet wiretapping standards, Declan McCullagh
• Re: [Raven] Determination of the need, Stuart Yeates
• Fwd: [Raven] Does CALEA wiretap law cover the Internet?, Paul Ferguson
• Re: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, hardie
• [Raven] Does CALEA wiretap law cover the Internet?, Declan McCullagh
• [Raven] FBI to IETF: It's time for Internet wiretapping standards, Declan McCullagh
• RE: [Raven] Determination of the need, Brian Rosen
• RE: [Raven] Determination of the need, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• Re: [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Christian Huitema
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, chefren
• RE: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, Chris Savage
• Re: [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, William Allen Simpson
• [Raven] Raven_Voice IP telephony, Fellows, Peter [UK]
• [Raven] What is a poor vendor to do?, Brian Rosen
• Re: [Raven] Determination of the need, Wendell_Bishop
• RE: [Raven] Determination of the need, Brian Rosen
• Re: [Raven] Re: Q#1 protocol security, Peter Gutmann
• [Raven] Determination of the need, Lynn, James
• Re: [Raven] Technology to support legal intercept, James Carlson
• RE: [Raven] Clarifying questions, Chris Savage
• RE: [Raven] Clarifying questions, Paul Ferguson
• RE: [Raven] Clarifying questions, Chris Savage
• RE: [Raven] US centricism ... and a global point, Chris Savage
• Re: [Raven] Re: Q#1 protocol security, Stephen Farrell
• [Raven] Thoughts on the problem while keeping the cat from my keyboard, Turner W. Rentz, III
• Re: [Raven] Wired News top story: Wiretapping the Net, Ben Laurie
• [Raven] Protocol vs. Host/Router Tapping, Nate Lawson
• [Raven] Wiretapping - a big NO., Eugene Leitl
• [Raven] RFC 1984, Sandy Harris
• Re: [Raven] A Vote for Practicality, William Allen Simpson
• Re: [Raven] Politics and not-politics, Bill Sommerfeld
• [Raven] Politics and not-politics, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• RE: [Raven] Clarifying questions, Paul Ferguson
• [Raven] Re: Q#1 protocol security, Peter Gutmann
• Oct 12 1999
• [Raven] Wiretapping - a big NO., Walter Reed
• [Raven] A choice of locations?, Nicholas C. Weaver
• [Raven] A little bit of history, Matthew Saroff
• [Raven] US centricism, hal
• Re: [Raven] Wired News top story: Wiretapping the Net, Christian Huitema
• [Raven] slashdot.org on wiretapping, Declan McCullagh
• [Raven] A little bit of politics, Richard Lamont
• Re: [Raven] The impracticality of wiretapping, Stuart Yeates
• [Raven] Wired News top story: Wiretapping the Net, Declan McCullagh
• Re: [Raven] Clarifying questions, Bill Sommerfeld
• [Raven] about the tapping discussion, Matt Clark
• Re: [Raven] The impracticality of wiretapping, Paul Krumviede
• [Raven] Wiretapping - a slipery slope, C. Wegrzyn
• [Raven] Q#2: informational, William Allen Simpson
• [Raven] Q#1 protocol security, William Allen Simpson
• [Raven] A Vote for Practicality, Brian Rosen
• RE: [Raven] Clarifying questions, Christian Huitema
• Re: [Raven] Technology to support legal intercept, Koen Holtman
• RE: [Raven] Clarifying questions, Chris Savage
• RE: [Raven] Technology to support legal intercept, Chris Savage
• [Raven] Clarifying questions, Stuart Staniford-Chen
• Re: [Raven] Technology to support legal intercept, Rob Lockhart
• [Raven] Technology to support legal intercept, Koen Holtman
• [Raven] The impracticality of wiretapping, Wendell_Bishop
• [Raven] The principled and the practical, Jon 'tex' Boone
• Re: [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?, Rob Lockhart
• Re: [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?, Declan McCullagh
• [Raven] Wiretapping, C. Wegrzyn
• [Raven] Should Tin Cans and String Comply With CALEA?, Chris Savage
• [Raven] Wiretapping Policy, Richard McAllister
• [Raven] Response to the IETF's questions, Thomas Junker
• [Raven] Other standards bodies, Scott Cadzow
• [Raven] Thoughts on the monitoring problem., Turner W. Rentz, III
• [Raven] Re: Which working group?, Scott Bradner
• Oct 11 1999
• [Raven] Which working group?, Declan McCullagh
• [Raven] The IETF's position on technology to support legal intercept, The IESG