[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Raven] And it ought to be remembered that there is...



Within the sphere of western liberal reasoning Machiavelli is quite contrary
to the values held.  Inevitably his philosophies leave us with the
assumption that man is a corrupt beast incapable of aspiring to a higher
calling.  How fitting it is that a proponet of tappable encryption should
quote a master of enslavement such as Machiavelli - and guise it in terms of
freedom.

Great leaders have always fiercly defended the goodness of man, never
propped up his weaknesses.

--Christian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: raven-admin@ietf.org [mailto:raven-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> chefren
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 4:09 PM
> To: raven@ietf.org
> Subject: [Raven] And it ought to be remembered that there is...
>
>
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~stilling/Prince.htm
>
>   ..
>
>   And it ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult
>   to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its
>   success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order
>   of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have
>   done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those
>   who may do well under the new. This coolness arises partly from
>   fear of the opponents, who have the laws  on their side, and partly
>   from the incredulity of men, who do not readily believe in new
>   things until they have had a long experience of them. Thus it
>   happens that whenever those who are hostile have the opportunity to
>   attack they do it like partisans, whilst the others defend
>   lukewarmly, in such wise that the prince is endangered along with
>   them. It is necessary, therefore, if we desire to discuss this
>   matter thoroughly, to inquire whether these innovators can rely on
>   themselves or have to depend on others: that is to say, whether, to
>   consummate their enterprise, have they to use prayers or can they
>   use force? In the first instance they always succeed badly, and
>   never compass  anything; but when they can rely on themselves and
>   use force, then they are rarely endangered. Hence it is that all
>   armed prophets have conquered, and the unarmed ones have been
>   destroyed. Besides the reasons mentioned, the nature of the people
>   is variable, and whilst it is easy to persuade them, it is
>   difficult to fix them in that persuasion. And thus it is necessary
>   to take such measures that, when they believe no longer, it may be
>   possible to make them believe by force.
>
>   ..
>
>   Niccolò Machiavelli, Il Principe, 1513/1514.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> raven mailing list
> raven@ietf.org
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven
>


_______________________________________________
raven mailing list
raven@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven