[rddp] Draft progress & schedule

[Black_David at emc.com]

A couple of updates from your WG chair:

(1) I believe that the text changes needed to clear the
	final IESG issues on the RDDP architecture draft
	are understood, and I've asked the draft editor to
	produce a new version.  Both issues were minor:
	- When using a multi-destination transport like SCTP,
		the effect of a transfer via an stags can't
		depend on which IP address receives the packets.
		If this can't be accomplished, don't use RDDP.
	- Add text stating the MUST implement IPsec
		security requirement.
	The RFC Editor will publish the RDDP problem statement
	and architecture as a set of RFCs (i.e., they'll
	appear together).

(2) I want to see ready-for-WG-Last-Call versions of the
	DDP, RDMAP, and Security drafts by the end of next
	week (submit them to the secretariat by Fri, Dec 3
	and cc: me on the submission email).  This is so
	that this WG Last Call can be finished before the
	end-of-December holidays divert everyone's attention.

Thanks,
--David

----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david at emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp