RE: [rddp] Minn. meeting & draft status

["Shah, Hemal" <hemal.shah at intel.com>]

I agree with Tom that we need to meet to discuss status of various WG
action items rather than completely canceling the WG meeting. In
addition, at this time changing the flights at the last moment will not
be possible for many of us who were planning to attend RDDP WG.

Hemal

-----Original Message-----
From: rddp-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Talpey, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 1:25 PM
To: Black_David at emc.com
Cc: rddp at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] Minn. meeting & draft status

At 12:08 PM 3/1/2005, Black_David at emc.com wrote:
>Since the WG Last call on the DDP, RDMAP and Security
>drafts has completed without any technical issues, I
>intend to cancel the RDDP WG meeting in Minneapolis,
>unless there are other technical issues to discuss

I think it would be a shame for folks who were in attendance
anyway not to meet. There was only one hour on the agenda,
and it seems that even a 10 minute review of the various WG
action items and their status would be a good thing to place
into minutes, for the record. Will IPS have any feedback for
us to discuss?

Tom.


_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp