RE: [rddp] Minn. meeting & draft status

[Renato Recio <recio at us.ibm.com>]

I agree with Mike, if there aren't any technical issues, I'd rather just not have a meeting to chat on the weather :{) or other non-critical topics.

Also... though I already had tickets... my company would likely appreciate me saving them hotel and meal expsenses.

Thanks

Renato J Recio
Chief Architect, eServer I/O
IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member IBM Academy of Technology
Tel 512-838-3685, T/L 678-3685

Michael Krause <krause at cup.hp.com>

Michael Krause <krause at cup.hp.com> Sent by: rddp-bounces at ietf.org 03/01/2005 02:59 PM

To: "RDDP" <rddp at ietf.org> cc: Subject: RE: [rddp] Minn. meeting & draft status

I think status can be easily accomplished via the reflector and there is little value-add in having a in-person meeting for such discussions.  If there are technical issues of merit to discuss, then this warrants such a meeting but that is not what is being presented here.

Mike

At 12:54 PM 3/1/2005, Shah, Hemal wrote:

I agree with Tom that we need to meet to discuss status of various WG
action items rather than completely canceling the WG meeting. In
addition, at this time changing the flights at the last moment will not
be possible for many of us who were planning to attend RDDP WG.

Hemal

-----Original Message-----
From: rddp-bounces at ietf.org [ mailto:rddp-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Talpey, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 1:25 PM
To: Black_David at emc.com
Cc: rddp at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] Minn. meeting & draft status

At 12:08 PM 3/1/2005, Black_David at emc.com wrote:
>Since the WG Last call on the DDP, RDMAP and Security
>drafts has completed without any technical issues, I
>intend to cancel the RDDP WG meeting in Minneapolis,
>unless there are other technical issues to discuss

I think it would be a shame for folks who were in attendance
anyway not to meet. There was only one hour on the agenda,
and it seems that even a 10 minute review of the various WG
action items and their status would be a good thing to place
into minutes, for the record. Will IPS have any feedback for
us to discuss?

Tom.


_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp _______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp