Remote Data Direct Placement Working Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• [rddp] Normative references to RDDP security document, Jim Pinkerton
• [rddp] Draft San Diego Agenda, Black_David
• [rddp] Broadcom IPR in MPA, Black_David
• [rddp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [rddp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-rddp-security-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [rddp] Authors: SUBMIT DRAFTS!!, Black_David
• [rddp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-rddp-arch-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [rddp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-rddp-problem-statement-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [rddp] MPA as MUST over TCP, Black_David
• [rddp] Some RDDP attacks, Black_David
  • Re: [rddp] Some RDDP attacks, Caitlin Bestler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rddp] Some RDDP attacks, Jim Pinkerton
  • RE: [rddp] Some RDDP attacks, Jim Pinkerton
  • RE: [rddp] Some RDDP attacks, Talpey, Thomas
  • RE: [rddp] Some RDDP attacks, pat_thaler
• RE: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not beneededfo r RDDP/iWARP, Black_David
  • Re: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not beneededfo r RDDP/iWARP, Caitlin Bestler
    • Re: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not beneededfo r RDDP/iWARP, Michael Krause
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not beneededfo r RDDP/iWARP, Black_David
• RE: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not beneededfor RDDP/iWARP, Jim Pinkerton
• RE: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not be neededfor RDDP/iWARP, Jim Pinkerton
  • Message not available
    • RE: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not be neededfor RDDP/iWARP, Michael Krause
• RE: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not be needed for RDDP/iWARP, Black_David
  • Re: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not be needed for RDDP/iWARP, Caitlin Bestler
    • Re: [rddp] Why IPsec is needed for iSCSI but might not be needed for RDDP/iWARP, Caitlin Bestler