[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Rmt] Should FLUTE File Aggregation I-D be a working group item?

To: rmt at ietf.org
Subject: [Rmt] Should FLUTE File Aggregation I-D be a working group item?
From: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca at inrialpes.fr>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:01:24 +0100
List-help: <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Reliable Multicast Transport <rmt.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:rmt@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: rmt-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)

Dear colleagues,

Following the recommendation of Lorenzo on Monday, during the RMT WG session, we are asking you whether you see any good reason to make the FLUTE File Aggregation I-D (draft-neumann-rmt-flute-file-aggregation-02.txt)*** *a working group item or not.

Please do not hesitate to comment.

Cheers,

  Vincent.


_______________________________________________
Rmt mailing list
Rmt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Rmt] Should FLUTE File Aggregation I-D be a working group item?
  - From: Christoph Neumann

Prev by Date: [Rmt] Should RS FEC I-D be a working group item?
Next by Date: RE: [Rmt] Should RS FEC I-D be a working group item?
Previous by thread: [Rmt] Should RS FEC I-D be a working group item?
Next by thread: Re: [Rmt] Should FLUTE File Aggregation I-D be a working group item?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread