RE: [rohc] TCP compression profile

["Price, Richard" <richard.price@roke.co.uk>]

Hi,

So, just to check, is there any part of our implementation that
would be useful to document separately (either in internet-drafts
or on the mailing list)?

The implementation has two new encoding methods not currently
described in the notation draft (see my previous post on updating
the formal notation).  I believe it would be good to add these to
the next version of the draft - if no-one objects, I can make this
update before the deadline next week.

The other new material that we've provided is a set of test
vectors for the implementation (including some TCP flows, as
well as some generic tests to make sure that the implementation
is working correctly).  Might it be worth putting these in a
draft at some stage, like we did for the SigComp torture tests?

Regards,

Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Erik Jonsson (EAB) 
> [mailto:Lars-Erik.Jonsson@epl.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:13 AM
> To: Price, Richard; 'rohc@ietf.org'
> Subject: RE: [rohc] TCP compression profile
> 
> 
> Richard,
> 
> I hope this input will be useful for the further TCP profile work,
> i.e. for defining the compressed header formats, but it is a rather
> substantial material to read and understand (especially considering
> previous problems of getting people involved in these notation
> discussions) so we will have to give this some time.
> 
> Anyway, I have to provide some comments and guidelines on procedural
> matters, considering this input. This is an IETF WG, and input is
> expected to be provided either:
> 1) in internet-drafts, or
> 2) in messages to the WG mail list 
> 
> Some material, like implementations, might of course be difficult
> to provide through those channels, and then exceptions may have to
> be made. However, such exceptions should only be made when really
> necessary, both because we have common IETF principles to simplify
> for all involved parties and be consistent, and because of archival
> reasons. Except for implementations, material for the WG to consider
> must be posted through our official channels (drafts or mail list).
> 
> /L-E
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Lars-Erik Jonsson
> IETF ROHC WG Chair
> E-mail: lars-erik.jonsson@ericsson.com
> Phone: +46 920 20 21 07
> Home: +46 920 999 57
> 
> My opinions are my personal opinions and should not be considered
> as the opinions of my employer, if not explicitly stated. 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc