RE: [rohc] ROHC-TCP: Update and some topics to be discussed

["Lars-Erik Jonsson (EAB)" <Lars-Erik.Jonsson@epl.ericsson.se>]

Richard,

> One issue that isn't mentioned below is the packet formats
> themselves (i.e. the CO packets and the IR-REPLICATE packets).
> This is the last major gap in the ROHC-TCP profile - it would
> be great if we could fill it in before Vienna, as we'd then
> have enough to offer a real, working TCP compression scheme...
> 
> For the CO packets, we've made an initial proposal in:
> 
> draft-price-rohc-tcp-packet-formats-00.txt
> 
> The draft lists the packet formats in both ROHC-FN form and 
> box notation form, so we can discuss the formats themselves
> without worrying about how they're documented.

I do not think our problem here is in the details, but rather
how to put the formats in ROHC TCP. If we had known that, we 
could easily include a first-attempt format set and then improved
it, but I do not think that makes sense without first agreeing
on the format documentation approach.

/L-E
_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc