RE: [rohc] ROHC-TCP: Update and some topics to be discussed

["Price, Richard" <richard.price@roke.co.uk>]

> > One issue that isn't mentioned below is the packet formats
> > themselves (i.e. the CO packets and the IR-REPLICATE packets).
> > This is the last major gap in the ROHC-TCP profile - it would
> > be great if we could fill it in before Vienna, as we'd then
> > have enough to offer a real, working TCP compression scheme...
> > 
> > For the CO packets, we've made an initial proposal in:
> > 
> > draft-price-rohc-tcp-packet-formats-00.txt
> > 
> > The draft lists the packet formats in both ROHC-FN form and 
> > box notation form, so we can discuss the formats themselves
> > without worrying about how they're documented.
> 
> I do not think our problem here is in the details, but rather
> how to put the formats in ROHC TCP. If we had known that, we 
> could easily include a first-attempt format set and then improved
> it, but I do not think that makes sense without first agreeing
> on the format documentation approach.

In this case, should the ROHC-TCP draft contain proposals for the
IR and IR-DYN packets? Is it really ok to include these without
first agreeing on the format documentation approach?

Regards,

Richard
_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc