[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[rohc] LLA-ROHC question

To: ROHC WG <rohc at ietf.org>
Subject: [rohc] LLA-ROHC question
From: Qiaobing Xie <Qiaobing.Xie at motorola.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 18:06:48 +0800
List-help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: rohc-admin at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1

Hi,

I wonder how friendly is LLA-ROHC towards RTP packets with a customer defined header extension (i.e., X flag =1). How is this handled?

regards,
-Qiaobing

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc

Prev by Date: [rohc] ROHC context reuse & mode
Next by Date: RE: [rohc] LLA-ROHC question
Previous by thread: [rohc] ROHC context reuse & mode
Next by thread: RE: [rohc] LLA-ROHC question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread