RE: [rohc] TCP profile FN, ip_id_behavior_enc

["Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)" <lars-erik.jonsson at ericsson.com>]

Actually, the way we cover the zero case is by the more generic definition CONSTANT, right?

/L-E

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eilert Brinkmann [mailto:eilert at tzi.org]
> Sent: den 8 april 2005 09:25
> To: Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
> Cc: Finking, Robert; rohc at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rohc] TCP profile FN, ip_id_behavior_enc
> 
> 
> "Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)" wrote:
> >> IP_ID_BEHAVIOR_SEQUENTIAL         = 0;
> >> IP_ID_BEHAVIOR_SEQUENTIAL_SWAPPED = 1;
> >> IP_ID_BEHAVIOR_RANDOM             = 2;
> >> IP_ID_BEHAVIOR_RANDOM_SWAPPED     = 3;
> >
> > And what would "RANDOM_SWAPPED" mean? 
> 
> Argh, just an ugly mistake. Obviously, I mixed something up when
> composing the constant names.
> 
> > Do we cover IP_ID_ZERO? Then no field at all is sent, but anyway...
> 
> Yes. Of course, the fourth definition should be:
> 
> IP_ID_BEHAVIOR_ZERO = 3;
> 
> Eilert
> 

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc