RE: [rohc] FN let statements and TCP packet formats (was: Updated FN Draft - Appendix A)

["Finking, Robert" <robert.finking at roke.co.uk>]

Hi L-E, All,

OK - expect an update next week some time =)

Thanks for getting involved everybody - useful discussion.

Regards

Raffles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB) 
> [mailto:lars-erik.jonsson at ericsson.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:32 PM
> To: Finking, Robert
> Subject: RE: [rohc] FN let statements and TCP packet formats 
> (was: Updated FN Draft - Appendix A)
> 
> 
> OK, as a guidelines for rewriting the let description, I hope 
> you will use the ideas you've developed during our 
> discussions, i.e. to explain conceptually the relation 
> between binding, assignment, assertion, and how let covers 
> all these aspects. I also expect additional examples for 
> appendix B that shows when/how let is needed, with different 
> purposes. Assignment is already there, an example of the 
> assertion usage (like for IP-ID, with parameter?) should be 
> added, and probably also an example when you have both types 
> of usages.
> 
> /L-E
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc