Re: [rohc] sigcomp-sip: David Ward's DISCUSS

["Lars-Erik Jonsson" <larsman at home.se>]

> However, this may be a bit opaque to people new to this set of  
> documents.
> Also, the discussion of NACK in the draft only relates to SigComp  
> state; it could mention that NACK (now being mandatory) is the  
> general way to handle decompression failure.
>
> All of this is editorial, I think, but I also think it would be nice  
> not to entirely rely on the reader making the connections.

Agree, on both points!

> Any opinions?  I could go ahead and draft some text.

That would be excellent, please do so!

Thanks,
/L-E

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc