[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[rohc] One DOubt Regarding the ROHC-TCP

To: rohc at ietf.org
Subject: [rohc] One DOubt Regarding the ROHC-TCP
From: Ganesh <ganeshbabukamma at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:01:44 +0900
Delivered-to: rohc at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+A5trWgomrQcB3Ls9wdMprlNkf7KecxvElGF0cfUhb4=; b=K/TlAjGme+5W9QUJEC1Cja1mHcke2D7V7820tvZvdL0n1f0ON308cUadKDmv73FJfw vPYZcXPkfTz2d10KyDfrxoyBZx15nLp3HQ3a1CsKjMpDOR/kY9tgBz6eLcDDe6XKO5qP I3+z5a8TMVWqPWU0wRuKEoDvxf1FYU0Xz0Clc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=RvINrxWbzUPMukf90ca/yYqqt2cfdshBCsNbj93buTKfOAKFjw+W/jWfVl7Ofz5SA6 4shu3h98fgLKSsAY/vluK0Lvl+IeZLZFOST6RITvVa9ODNPiAbSa+2rLRiNJWZlteJ7l LHw0VYbTIRsN47czUEFDXpOshK5ztWgpbHTD8=
In-reply-to: <adc9dae40907270400y2a860657p156c8e620b4264df at mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <adc9dae40907270400y2a860657p156c8e620b4264df at mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

THe RFC 4996, is more inclined to ROHCV2 profiles, but the profile number is defined as 0x006 (version 1), as per the RFC 5225, if we have multiple variants of ROHC versions, then the ROHC compressor and decompressor after negotiation has to use only one version, if version 2 is selected, then how the TCP packets will be compressed??

Can any one please reply to the Question??

Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh Babu Kamma

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rohc] One DOubt Regarding the ROHC-TCP
  - From: Klaus Warnke

Prev by Date: Re: [rohc] Queries from a beginner
Next by Date: Re: [rohc] One DOubt Regarding the ROHC-TCP
Previous by thread: [rohc] Queries from a beginner
Next by thread: Re: [rohc] One DOubt Regarding the ROHC-TCP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread