RE: [rohc] draft-ace-robust-hc-01.txt

[Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 khiem.le@nokia.com wrote:

> > What we are trying to do is to give the basic and clear ideas.
> 
> Hey! Academic paper!
> 
> KL: I don't see the relationship between giving basic and clear ideas and
> the "academic" or "non academic" nature of the draft. Are you implying that
> "non-academic" papers don't give the basic and clear ideas? Am I missing
> something here?


Well, your draft focuses on presenting ACE as a workable thesis,
rather than merely the details necessary for an interoperable
implemention. My impression is that the test results (section 12) and
conclusions would be more suited for a traditional paper comparing ACE
and 2508 in more detail that the draft could reference for support.
You'd have a clearer comparison showing the benefits of ACE, and a
clearer, shorter, draft.

btw, shouldn't the 'Intellectual Property Considerations' section be
up top in the 'Status of this Memo' section?

cheers,

L.

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>