IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Working Group Last Call:draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey-02

Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> Mon, 08 December 2008 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <roll-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-roll-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56C728C13B; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:50:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E975B28C13B for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:50:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t3jw3Wbb8VK5 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mho-02-bos.mailhop.org (mho-02-bos.mailhop.org [63.208.196.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D99128C137 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aste-genev-bois-153-1-11-44.w83-112.abo.wanadoo.fr ([83.112.73.44] helo=[192.168.147.109]) by mho-02-bos.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <ietf@thomasclausen.org>) id 1L9lBX-000JHK-QK; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:50:24 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 83.112.73.44
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/7IaD7tKz0DSe0aI62Yv6e
In-Reply-To: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D01652699@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
References: <7C1A2E64-C1B0-472E-B354-77F290BBC80D@cisco.com> <374005f30812050849refe8122i63629f469f8ba7c8@mail.gmail.com> <7471DA6B-7B09-42BB-8291-C30C83576295@cs.stanford.edu> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D01652699@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Message-Id: <E3A7879D-2DE9-49C4-9A27-15EF211E8ADA@thomasclausen.org>
From: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:50:34 +0100
To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Cc: charliep@computer.org, roll@ietf.org, arsalan@eecs.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Roll] Working Group Last Call:draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey-02
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: roll-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: roll-bounces@ietf.org

On Dec 8, 2008, at 18:58 PM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:

>
>> Your point about hierarchical addressing is interesting, and I think
>> it relates to comments others have made on fisheye routing and other
>> state suppression approaches.
>
> Not quite. Hierarchical allocation is indeed a state suppression
> approach. However fisheye is a control message suppression approach.
>

And, it should be added that such are, of course complementing each  
other.

Thomas

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email