Re: [Roll] ETX metric
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Roll] ETX metric



On Oct 14, 2009, at 9:30 PM, Philip Levis wrote:


On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Maxence Dalmais wrote:


I am saying that when using wireless links, a node should be aware that his communication could interfere with other communication. Less powered is the transmission signal, less noise is seen by neighbours.

It also means that it's more greatly affected by interference from neighbors: there is no free lunch.

A low powered node will also need less energy to communicate in a less noisy environnement.

In low-power wireless chipsets, CMOS dominates power costs. E.g., a chip that draws 60mW transmits at 1mW. Reducing transmit power typically does not conserve much energy.

I have the same data.


So, it appears to me logical that when others metrics are egals to choose the less power needed links.

I don't know of any strong experimental evidence supporting this conclusion. Can you point me at some?


And same conclusion.

Phil


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.