Re: [Roll] feedback on draft-ietf-roll-rpl-03
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Roll] feedback on draft-ietf-roll-rpl-03



My 2 cents...

On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Mathilde Durvy (mdurvy) wrote:

Hi Emmanuel,
 
I very much agree with your comments. Especially with the two points below that could reduce a lot the complexity.

# Section 2
I am wondering if some of the terms are unecessary at this point. In particular, DAG siblings. Since siblings introduce quite a tricky complexity/benefit trade-off, I would be in  favor of getting rid of these in the core RPL document. This could be a welcomed simplification.
Agree, for me siblings are note part of the core.

+1

 
 # Section 3.2.1: 
"RPL constructs one or more DAGs". The consensus is that the core RPL document should specify how to build a single DAG to reach a single destination. This may be used to simplify the document a bit. 
Agree. I think what is needed are just procedures to join a DAG and leave a DAG.  


+1

Thomas

Best,
Mathilde 
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.