[Roll] [roll] #6: Multicast DAO
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Roll] [roll] #6: Multicast DAO
#6: Multicast DAO
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: jpv at … | Owner: wintert at …
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: rpl | Version:
Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Email from Julien
regarding usage of multicast DAO: in the following scenario:
A
/ \
B C
if the purpose is to to allow B and C to talk to each other directly, the
multicast DAO is equivalent to an unsolicited NA.
In the scenarios like:
A
/ \
B C
|
D
if the purpose is to have B talk to D through C (instead of A then C),
then the multicast DAO (including destination prefix option) makes sense.
Is this scenario needed by some applications?
Best,
Julien
--
Ticket URL: <http://rsync.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/6>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.