![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Hi Mathilde, If that parent is preferred, it is probably because that’s
where most of the traffic should land. This is why rank and metrics are expected to be propagated from
that of that preferred parent. Allowing other parents to impact the rank is opening the door to
greediness. So we picked the simple path of accepting parents that are upwards
once the rank is selected from the honest-to-God preferred parent. Pascal From: roll-bounces at ietf.org
[mailto:roll-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Hi, On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Mathilde Durvy (mdurvy) wrote:
Hi
All, Section
5.9.1 says
"When the scan is complete, the preferred parent is elected and Shouldn't
the rank of the node also depend on the non-preferred parents? Or
is it assumed that the node always forward traffic via its most preferred
parent? A node may indeed choose to send traffic to an alternate
parent and not the most preferred. But do you think that this should change the way its
computes its rank ? JP.
Best, Mathilde
_______________________________________________ | |||||||||